The cryptography that backs Privacy Pass provides two interlocked guarantees: If the second site trusts the first, they might treat people with tokens more favorably than those without. The second site then knows that a visitor with a token is considered OK by the first site, but they don’t learn anything else. Other sites can ask people to give them a token. The way Privacy Pass works is that one website hands out special tokens to people the site thinks are OK. For the Web, the central idea is that Privacy Pass might provide websites with a clean indication that a visitor is OK, separate from the details of their browsing history. It is a generalization of a system originally developed by Cloudflare to reduce their dependence on CAPTCHAs and tracking. Privacy Pass is a framework published by the IETF that is seen as having the potential to help address this difficult problem. For instance, Google’s Web Environment Integrity proposal fell flat because of its potential to be used to unduly constrain personal choice in how to engage online (see our position for details). Well-meaning attempts can easily fail without giving due consideration to other factors. (You can find a fun overview of the current state of CAPTCHA here.)įinding a technical solution to this problem that does not involve such privacy violations is an appealing challenge, but a difficult one. Even worse, beneath this sometimes infuriating facade is a system that depends extensively on invasive tracking and profiling. One way that sites protect themselves is to find some way to sort “good” visitors from “bad.” CAPTCHAs are a widely loathed and unreliable means of distinguishing human visitors from automated solvers. Denial of service attacks, fraud and other flavors of abusive behavior are a constant pressure on website operators. The post Mozilla’s Comments to FCC: Net Neutrality Essential for Competition, Innovation, Privacy appeared first on Open Policy & Advocacy.Īs much as the Web continues to inspire us, we know that sites put up with an awful lot of abuse in order to stay online. We encourage others who are passionate about the open internet to file reply comments on the proceeding, which are due January 17, 2024. With vast increases in our dependence on the internet since the COVID-19 pandemic, these protections are more important than ever. Simply put, if the FCC moves forward with reclassification of broadband as a Title II service, it will protect innovation in edge services unlock vital privacy safeguards and prevent ISPs from leveraging their market power to control people’s experiences online. Our recently submitted comment to the FCC’s NPRM took a step back to remind the FCC and the public of the real benefits of net neutrality: Competition, Grassroots Innovation, Privacy, and Transparency and Accountability. Most notably, this included Mozilla’s challenge to the Trump FCC’s dismantling of net neutrality in 2018.Īmerican internet users are on the cusp of renewed protections for the open internet. We have been fighting for net neutrality around the world for the better part of a decade and a half. With the FCC putting out a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to reinstate net neutrality, Mozilla weighed in last week with a clear message: the FCC should reestablish these common sense rules as soon as possible. Net neutrality – the concept that your internet provider should not be able to block, throttle, or prioritize elements of your internet service, such as to favor their own products or business partners – is on the docket again in the United States.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |